The Housing Chronicles Blog: The Wall Street Journal Developments blog
Showing posts with label The Wall Street Journal Developments blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Wall Street Journal Developments blog. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2009

My first post for the 'Developments' blog of the Wall Street Journal

I'm very pleased to report that, after several iterations during the editing process, my first blog post for the 'Developments' blog covering California trends has just been published:

Considering the amount of overbuilding that took place in California during the boom, some type of decline was necessary in order to bring supply and demand back into balance. The latest update on California building permits shows just how drastic that decline has been.

According to statistics from the California Building Industry Association (CBIA) (full report), the number of residential housing permits issued statewide in November fell to 4,544 — a 17% drop from the same period in 2007. For all of 2008 an estimated 64,000 building permits were issued — the lowest level since records were first kept in 1954. For single-family homes alone, 2008 will likely end up with less than 32,000 permits for a state of 36 million, marking a decline of well over 50% from 2007’s already low levels. (The report covers single- and multi-family residential permits.)...

Click for entire post here.

Many thanks to Christopher Thornberg at Beacon Economics for suggesting me to the Journal. He will also be a regular (if occasional) contributor on economic trends related to real estate, so be sure to look for his posts.

Have any ideas on posts you'd like to see? Email me suggestions at info@metrointel.com.

Friday, May 16, 2008

The impact of rising gas prices on suburbia

The Developments blog at the Wall Street Journal has an interesting post on the long-term impact of rising gas prices on suburban development -- a subject this blog has discussed on numerous occasions and well before the recent run-up in prices at the pump (hat tip to Patrick.net):

Rising gasoline prices have affected much of American life –- from the cars we drive to the vacations we take. A new study, however, indicates that increasing gas prices may have the strongest impact closer to home — the houses we choose to live in.

In a report entitled “Driven to the Brink: How the Gas Price Spike Popped the Housing Bubble and Devalued the Suburbs,” released this month by CEOs for Cities, economist Joe Cortright contends that while predatory lending and subprime mortgages had a hand in today’s housing crisis, higher gas prices played a major role –- and will have a much longer-lasting impact on U.S. consumers’ home-buying preferences...

Higher gas prices negatively impact housing prices by sapping home buyers’ budgets and leaving less to spend on housing, and by making consumers less apt to bid more for homes in less centrally located suburbs, he explains.

The study notes that while initiatives by states and the federal government to ease the housing market’s woes will have some positive effect on the real-estate market in the months ahead, higher fuel costs will permanently impact the suburban landscape as more home buyers choose to reside in closer-in locations that offer shorter commutes and mass transit.

He point out that in metropolitan areas like Chicago, Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Portland and Tampa, home prices have fallen more in farther-flung ZIP codes than in close-in neighborhoods. For instance, in Chicago, while housing prices have remained stable in close-in neighborhoods within three miles of the city’s central business district over the past 12 months, home prices have fallen 4% in “distant” neighborhoods 13 miles from the central business district. And in Los Angeles, while home prices have dropped 6% in close-in neighborhoods, they have decreased 10% in distant neighborhoods, according to the report.

Meanwhile, an article in Sunday’s Arizona Daily Star newspaper looked at the effect gas prices may have on suburbs in Tucson, Ariz. While some individuals quoted in the article expressed a desire to move closer in to the city to cut down on gasoline costs, other said they prefer to remain in the outskirts despite fuel costs because they perceive the suburbs to be more family friendly and safer than residing in the city.