The Housing Chronicles Blog: new home market research
Showing posts with label new home market research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new home market research. Show all posts

Sunday, November 30, 2008

2008 in review and a look ahead

When 2008 began, the common wisdom of the day was that 2008 would prove to be a difficult year, and that builders should prepare for a market rebound sometime in 2009. However, with the world falling into recession and federal government bailouts becoming a staple of daily news, it now looks like any sustained market rebound could very well be postponed until 2010. Yet before you look for the nearest window in which to jump out of, there do remain specific opportunities for builders who are willing to conduct detailed demand studies and plan for worst-case scenarios that have the potential to improve along with the economy.

The current recession, like any others, began with a large shock to the economy – in this case, correcting a large imbalance in real estate markets nationwide. But what’s making this shock even worse is that the combination of falling prices and tighter credit is preventing people from either refinancing their way out of trouble and staying put or simply selling their homes and perhaps changing both locales and careers. Moreover, career paths once considered safe havens – such as in government, finance or media – have become just as perilous as technology, entertainment or, as many of you well know, in real estate.

If that wasn’t enough with which to contend, this same lack of credit is beginning to force a correction in a related area -- consumer spending and savings. Over the last 12 or 13 years, American households have been saving little and spending more on newer cars, larger homes and the latest in consumer gadgets. Add to that the wealth effect from rising home values and fatter stock market valuations, and it’s not hard to see why contributions to 401k accounts and savings accounts declined as household debt rose while incomes remained mostly stagnant.

Consequently we’re in what the folks at Beacon Economics have dubbed ‘the mother of all hangovers,’ which in the short-run leads to something called the ‘paradox of thrift:’ as the savings rate goes up (which is good for household budgets) the overall economy shrinks due to less overall demand. Yet in the long run, these types of economic shifts are critical for an eventual recovery better able to leverage a productive workforce, great technology and solid investments in infrastructure.

So what’s ahead for the overall U.S. economy in 2009? At this point in time, the forecast calls for mostly more hangovers with occasional sunny days in particular markets. As forecast recently by Beacon, GDP is expected to continue declining through the third quarter of 2009 as excessive demand based on debt is wrung out of the economy.

Rising unemployment rates, which are being met by calls for a second stimulus package from the nascent Obama Administration, will continue to gradually increase, peaking at 7.8% in early 2010 before dipping back down by the end of that year. Fortunately, the fear of near-term inflation will be kept in check and rise only slightly to approach 1.29% per quarter by the end of 2010, although the entire amount of various federal bail-outs of the automobile, housing and other industries will also undoubtedly impact long-term inflation rates if the Federal Reserve continues to print money.

What that likely means for the new home market in 2009 is continued turmoil, although retiring NAHB chief economist David Seiders is hopeful for a mid-year rebound. Looking at the most recent figures, although the pace of annual new home sales rose slightly in September over August levels to 464,000 units, that level is still down by one-third from a year ago and marks the lowest September numbers since 1981 (just three years ago in the boom year of 2005, 1.3 million homes were sold.)

Even as builders continue to clamp down on production in an attempt to bring down inventory levels, at current sales rates, the number of unsold single-family homes – 394,000 -- would take just over 10 months to sell. Still, at a recent semi-annual construction forecast, Seiders was hopeful that 2009 would be a rebound year and finish up with a seasonally adjusted rate of 600,000 single-family sales. Of course he is also paid to be optimistic!

One thing on which most economists agree is the important role played by new home affordability. With a median selling price of just over $218,000 in September, the sharpest spikes in regional sales have been in markets suffering the steepest price drops, and the consensus is for prices not to fall more than another 10 percent in 2009.

It’s also in those same areas that builders, who have already cut prices just about as far as they can and still remain in business, continue to compete with foreclosures, which in the West can account for as much as 40% of existing home sales. Yet as one economist presenting at the NAHB forecast concluded, builders don’t have to convince everyone to buy a new home – just some people.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Why a new home market rebound may be delayed

A funny thing happened on the way to the housing bust: rising foreclosures of newer homes, which are increasingly competing with homes offered by builders in both price and quality. In the past, the new home market often rebounded faster than existing resales, but this time might be different. I pulled some stats from the early 1990s and compared this downturn with the last one and summarized it in my latest column for Builder & Developer magazine:

Whereas in the past homes being auctioned on the courthouse steps or offered by the REO departments of lenders were often old and in need of updating, many of today’s foreclosures are newer homes that increasingly compete with unsold new home inventory. The trend is startling: with buyers enjoying rising home equity during the first half of this decade and low teaser rates offered on sub-prime and Option ARM loans from 2004 through 2007, mortgage delinquencies either fell or rose very slightly, generally less than 2%. But as these loans began to re-set and borrowers found themselves unable to finance due to negative equity, by the first quarter of 2008 delinquencies spiked up by 30% and the first stages of foreclosures skyrocketed by 71% on the heels of a 40% jump a year earlier.

It seems reasonable to assume that such record jumps in housing inventory – homes that will have to be discounted in price to sell – will impact both the timing and trajectory for a new home market recovery.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Lessons from "Building Better Market Research - Housing 2.0: Orange County"

I was going to write up a summary of some key points we made at yesterday's presentation in Irvine, but Jonathan Smoke did it so well on his blog at Housing Intelligence that I'm just going to point you over there with some highlights (he has more details including graphs at his blog):

I flew into Orange County the day after S&P released the March Case-Shiller price indices, which showed that existing home prices were down year-over-year 21.7% in Los Angeles.

The housing picture is ugly in the OC. Looking at Median Home Prices, if you had purchased a median priced home at the peak of the market, you’d be down almost $100,000 as of March. The median home price is currently in the low $600’s...

New home production has tanked. Single family permits were only a third of their prior peak in 2002, and the decline is not abating so far into 2008.

Prices are down, sales are down, production is down. Is there any hope for the future?

Sure there is...

We know that demand has not lived up to expectations because we can compare our proprietary estimate of demand to the actual last 12 months of sales. Our demand numbers represent what demand should be in normal market conditions.

We factor household formation by consumer segment, ownership rates by segment, trends in ownership, and structural replacements. We can’t account for negative psychology—there’s simply no reliable historic data with enough granularity to line it up with the rest of our data.

At all but the $450,000-500,000 price range, demand has not lived up to expectations. And that’s one more reason for hope. The demand is there. Households are still forming. The economic fundamentals are strong. Ownership has actually started to increase again because affordability is improving.


I’ve heard many “housing experts” describe the housing boom in these bubble markets as simply moving forward demand that would have materialized in future years. So, we’re now three years past the peak. The demand analysis may be showing us that we’ve worked through the borrowed demand and are now pushing demand into future periods.

The future when things start moving again will be when home prices have stabilized, credit is more available, and consumers are more confident. When that happens, we’ll see a surge in sales and likely new home production to work through the pent-up demand.

So to my new friends in the OC, hang in there. Follow some of the advice you heard from the conference. Focus on knowing your customers. Invest in changes to improve products and processes. Get as lean as possible to survive, and then come back with a vengeance!

How long will this take? The home price indices are not sending encouraging signals, but they are 30-60 days old and may be overly influenced by sales of foreclosed homes.

At least on the listings side of things, it would appear that the conditions are stabilizing...

The average days on market for listings have also declined and have been under 100 days for three months now. Yes, I know that’s still ugly, but it’s not getting worse.

Finally, inventories of single family homes have fallen back to the levels of a year ago.

If the demand is there, and I believe it is, these are encouraging signals. And remember, there are communities selling well now.